Hands up who doesn't know where Roehampton is?
Imagine for an instant that you're a Conservative councillor for Roehampton, representing one of the most deprived parts of London.There are huge problems to tackle: housing, employment, crime, poverty, keeping the estates in something passing for a vaguely acceptable state, traffic and of course the collapse of your plans to demolish Danebury Avenue. Which of these do you start with?
None of the above.
The thing that's keeping Roehampton Conservatives awake at night is a desire to change the name of their ward from "Roehampton" to "Roehampton and Putney Heath". They say that without the name change the residents of Putney Heath - that's less than 300 households - just won't know where they belong.
The Conservatives locally really need to sort out their priorities. This is what happens when one party ends up holding all the seats in an area: they lose touch with reality and lose track of what really matters: good housing, well-maintained streets, decent services and a desire to improve lives. Instead, they think tinkering with the name of one of the most easily identifiable parts of the borough is what passes for leadership locally.
What absurd dilitantes.
Labels: Conservatives, councillors, Putney Heath, Roehampton
I've long been interested in history: it's the subject I studied at university, and a couple of years ago The Wandsworth Borough News published an article I wrote investigating the local dignitaries who are commemorated in our borough.
On Tuesday I attended a public meeting organised by Roehampton's Safer Neighbourhood Police Team (SNT). These are regular meetings organised by these Labour-funded Police teams to explain local policing issues and address residents' concerns.


